January 9, 2025
🚀 What’s New in This 2025 Comparison
Platform Evolution Since 2017
- Kafka 4.0 Released - No ZooKeeper, improved performance, cloud-native features
- Kinesis Enhanced - 365-day retention, on-demand scaling, deeper AWS integration
- Managed Services Matured - Amazon MSK and Confluent Cloud now production-ready
- Cost Models Evolved - Better pricing for high-scale workloads
- Security Enhanced - Zero-trust architectures, advanced compliance
- Developer Experience - Improved tooling, SDKs, and monitoring
Key Differentiators in 2025
- ✅ Performance - Kafka leads in throughput, Kinesis in simplicity
- ✅ Cost - Kinesis for small/medium, Kafka for massive scale
- ✅ Operations - Kinesis is serverless, Kafka offers more control
- ✅ Ecosystem - Kinesis for AWS-native, Kafka for multi-cloud
Executive Summary
In 2025, both Amazon Kinesis and Apache Kafka have evolved into mature, enterprise-grade streaming platforms. This guide helps you choose the right platform based on your specific requirements, workload characteristics, and organizational capabilities.
Cloudurable provides Kafka training, Kafka consulting, Kinesis consulting, and helps organizations implement streaming architectures.
Core Platform Comparison
flowchart TB
subgraph Kinesis["Amazon Kinesis"]
K1[Kinesis Data Streams]
K2[Kinesis Data Firehose]
K3[Kinesis Data Analytics]
K4[Kinesis Video Streams]
end
subgraph Kafka["Apache Kafka"]
A1[Kafka Core/KRaft]
A2[Kafka Streams]
A3[Kafka Connect]
A4[ksqlDB]
end
subgraph Use Cases
UC1[Real-time Analytics]
UC2[Event Streaming]
UC3[Log Aggregation]
UC4[IoT Data]
UC5[ML Pipelines]
end
Kinesis --> UC1
Kinesis --> UC4
Kafka --> UC2
Kafka --> UC3
Both[Both Platforms] --> UC5
style Kinesis fill:#ff9900,stroke:#232f3e,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style Kafka fill:#231f20,stroke:#f7931e,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
Architectural Differences
Feature | Kinesis | Kafka |
---|---|---|
Scaling Unit | Shards (1MB/s write, 2MB/s read) | Partitions (30K+ msg/s) |
Data Model | Records in shards | Records in topic partitions |
Ordering | Per shard | Per partition |
Replication | Automatic 3 AZ sync | Configurable (typically 3) |
Consensus | Managed by AWS | KRaft (no ZooKeeper) |
Performance Benchmarks 2025
Throughput Comparison
graph LR
subgraph "Throughput (Messages/Second)"
A[Small Workload<br/>100K msg/s] -->|Kinesis: Easy| K1[10-100 shards]
A -->|Kafka: Overkill| K2[1-3 brokers]
B[Medium Workload<br/>1M msg/s] -->|Kinesis: Expensive| K3[1000 shards]
B -->|Kafka: Efficient| K4[6-10 brokers]
C[Large Workload<br/>10M+ msg/s] -->|Kinesis: Complex| K5[10K+ shards]
C -->|Kafka: Optimal| K6[20-50 brokers]
end
style A fill:#90EE90
style B fill:#FFD700
style C fill:#FF6347
Latency Characteristics
- Kafka: Sub-millisecond possible with tuning
- Kinesis: 70-200ms typical end-to-end latency
Scalability Limits
- Kafka: Virtually unlimited with proper architecture
- Kinesis: Soft limit of 10,000 shards per account (can be increased)
Cost Analysis 2025
Kinesis Pricing Model
Base Costs:
Shard Hour: $0.015/hour
PUT Payload Unit: $0.014 per million
Extended Retention: $0.023/GB/month
Example (1M events/day, 1KB each):
Monthly: ~$350-500
Kafka/MSK Pricing Model
MSK Costs:
kafka.m5.large: $0.21/hour ($151/month)
Storage: $0.10/GB/month
Data Transfer: Variable
Example (1M events/day, 1KB each):
Monthly: ~$450-600 (3 brokers)
Cost Decision Matrix
Daily Volume | Best Choice | Rationale |
---|---|---|
< 100K events | Kinesis | Lower operational overhead |
100K - 10M | Either | Depends on team expertise |
10M - 100M | MSK/Kafka | Better cost efficiency |
> 100M | Self-managed Kafka | Maximum cost optimization |
Feature Comparison 2025
Data Management
Feature | Kinesis | Kafka |
---|---|---|
Max Retention | 365 days | Unlimited |
Log Compaction | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Supported |
Replay | ✅ By timestamp | ✅ By offset/timestamp |
Compression | ✅ Automatic | ✅ Configurable |
Encryption | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Configurable |
Integration Ecosystem
Kinesis Native Integrations
- AWS Lambda - Direct triggers
- S3 - Via Firehose
- Redshift - Direct loading
- ElasticSearch - Via Firehose
- SageMaker - ML pipelines
- CloudWatch - Metrics/logs
Kafka Ecosystem
- Spark/Flink - Stream processing
- Debezium - CDC
- Elasticsearch - Via Connect
- HDFS/S3 - Via Connect
- Kubernetes - Native operators
- Every database - 200+ connectors
When to Choose Each Platform
Choose Kinesis When:
✅ AWS-Centric Architecture
- All infrastructure in AWS
- Heavy use of Lambda, S3, Redshift
- Need tight AWS service integration
✅ Operational Simplicity
- Limited DevOps resources
- Want serverless, no cluster management
- Prefer pay-per-use pricing
✅ Moderate Scale
- < 10 million events/day
- Predictable traffic patterns
- Standard retention needs
✅ Quick Time-to-Market
- Rapid prototyping
- Proof of concepts
- Startups/small teams
Choose Kafka When:
✅ Extreme Performance
- Need lowest latency
- Massive throughput (billions/day)
- Complex event processing
✅ Multi-Cloud/Hybrid
- Not locked to AWS
- On-premise requirements
- Multi-region deployments
✅ Advanced Features
- Log compaction needed
- Unlimited retention
- Custom partitioning
✅ Deep Customization
- Complex security requirements
- Custom monitoring/tooling
- Specific compliance needs
Managed Service Comparison
Amazon MSK vs Kinesis
graph TB
subgraph "Operational Responsibility"
subgraph "Kinesis"
K1[AWS Manages Everything]
K2[You: Configure shards]
K3[You: Set retention]
end
subgraph "MSK"
M1[AWS: Infrastructure]
M2[You: Kafka config]
M3[You: Topics/partitions]
M4[You: Monitoring setup]
end
end
K1 --> K2
K2 --> K3
M1 --> M2
M2 --> M3
M3 --> M4
style K1 fill:#90EE90
style M1 fill:#FFD700
Managed Kafka Options
- Amazon MSK - Best for AWS deployments
- Confluent Cloud - Best for multi-cloud
- Aiven - Good European option
- Redpanda Cloud - Kafka API compatible
Security & Compliance 2025
Kinesis Security
- IAM Integration - Native AWS permissions
- VPC Endpoints - Private connectivity
- KMS Encryption - At rest and in transit
- Compliance - HIPAA, PCI, SOC, FedRAMP
- Audit - CloudTrail integration
Kafka Security
- mTLS - Certificate-based auth
- SASL/SCRAM - Username/password
- ACLs - Fine-grained permissions
- Encryption - TLS and KMS
- Compliance - Depends on deployment
Real-World Use Cases
Companies Using Kinesis
- Netflix - Recommendation events
- Lyft - Real-time pricing
- Zillow - Property view tracking
- BBC - Live streaming analytics
- Samsung - IoT device telemetry
Companies Using Kafka
- LinkedIn - 7 trillion messages/day
- Uber - Trip updates
- Netflix - Event sourcing
- Airbnb - Search indexing
- Goldman Sachs - Trading systems
Developer Experience
Kinesis Development
// Simple Kinesis Producer
KinesisProducer producer = new KinesisProducer(config);
ListenableFuture<UserRecordResult> future = producer.addUserRecord(
"my-stream",
"partitionKey",
ByteBuffer.wrap(data)
);
// Simple Kinesis Consumer
KinesisClientLibConfiguration config = new KinesisClientLibConfiguration(
"my-app",
"my-stream",
credentialsProvider,
workerId
);
Worker worker = new Worker.Builder()
.recordProcessorFactory(new MyRecordProcessorFactory())
.config(config)
.build();
worker.run();
Kafka Development
// Simple Kafka Producer
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092");
props.put("key.serializer", StringSerializer.class);
props.put("value.serializer", StringSerializer.class);
Producer<String, String> producer = new KafkaProducer<>(props);
producer.send(new ProducerRecord<>("my-topic", "key", "value"));
// Simple Kafka Consumer
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092");
props.put("group.id", "my-group");
props.put("key.deserializer", StringDeserializer.class);
props.put("value.deserializer", StringDeserializer.class);
Consumer<String, String> consumer = new KafkaConsumer<>(props);
consumer.subscribe(Arrays.asList("my-topic"));
while (true) {
ConsumerRecords<String, String> records = consumer.poll(100);
for (ConsumerRecord<String, String> record : records) {
System.out.println(record.value());
}
}
Migration Strategies
Kinesis to Kafka Migration
flowchart LR
A[Kinesis] --> B[Dual Write]
B --> C[Kafka]
B --> D[Validation]
D --> E[Cut Over]
E --> F[Kafka Only]
style A fill:#ff9900
style F fill:#231f20
- Dual Write - Send to both systems
- Validate - Compare data integrity
- Migrate Consumers - One at a time
- Cut Over - Stop Kinesis writes
- Decommission - Remove Kinesis
Kafka to Kinesis Migration
Less common, but follows similar pattern with MirrorMaker or custom consumers.
Decision Framework
graph TD
A[Start] --> B{AWS Only?}
B -->|Yes| C{Scale?}
B -->|No| K[Choose Kafka]
C -->|Small/Medium| D{DevOps Team?}
C -->|Large| K
D -->|Limited| E[Choose Kinesis]
D -->|Strong| F{Cost Sensitive?}
F -->|Very| K
F -->|No| G{Need Simple?}
G -->|Yes| E
G -->|No| K
style E fill:#ff9900,color:#fff
style K fill:#231f20,color:#fff
Recommendations by Industry
Financial Services
- High-Frequency Trading: Kafka (latency critical)
- Fraud Detection: Either (Kinesis for AWS-native)
- Regulatory Reporting: Kafka (audit requirements)
E-Commerce
- Click Tracking: Kinesis (easy integration)
- Inventory Updates: Kafka (exactly-once)
- Recommendation Events: Either works well
IoT/Manufacturing
- Device Telemetry: Kinesis (managed scaling)
- Industrial IoT: Kafka (on-premise option)
- Connected Vehicles: Kafka (volume/features)
Media/Entertainment
- Video Analytics: Kinesis Video Streams
- User Engagement: Either platform
- Content Delivery: Kafka (global scale)
Future Outlook 2025-2026
Kinesis Roadmap
- Enhanced machine learning integration
- Lower latency options
- More granular cost controls
- Improved cross-region replication
Kafka Evolution
- Simplified operations (more like Kinesis)
- Better cloud-native features
- Enhanced security defaults
- Improved developer experience
Summary & Recommendations
For Most Organizations
-
Start with Kinesis if:
- You’re AWS-native
- Want minimal operations
- Have moderate scale
- Need quick deployment
-
Choose Kafka/MSK if:
- Need maximum performance
- Require advanced features
- Have multi-cloud needs
- Can invest in expertise
-
Consider Hybrid:
- Kinesis for simple pipelines
- Kafka for complex processing
- Bridge with Lambda/Connect
Action Items
- Evaluate current and projected scale
- Assess team capabilities
- Calculate total cost of ownership
- Run proof of concept
- Plan migration strategy
Get Expert Help
Need assistance choosing or implementing the right streaming platform?
Cloudurable offers:
- Architecture assessment
- Platform selection guidance
- Implementation services
- Migration assistance
- Training and mentoring
- 24/7 support
Contact us to discuss your streaming data needs.
Related Resources
- What is Kafka? (2025)
- Kafka Architecture Guide
- Kafka on AWS Best Practices
- Kinesis Training
- Kafka Training
Last updated: January 2025 - Reflecting latest features and pricing
TweetApache Spark Training
Kafka Tutorial
Akka Consulting
Cassandra Training
AWS Cassandra Database Support
Kafka Support Pricing
Cassandra Database Support Pricing
Non-stop Cassandra
Watchdog
Advantages of using Cloudurable™
Cassandra Consulting
Cloudurable™| Guide to AWS Cassandra Deploy
Cloudurable™| AWS Cassandra Guidelines and Notes
Free guide to deploying Cassandra on AWS
Kafka Training
Kafka Consulting
DynamoDB Training
DynamoDB Consulting
Kinesis Training
Kinesis Consulting
Kafka Tutorial PDF
Kubernetes Security Training
Redis Consulting
Redis Training
ElasticSearch / ELK Consulting
ElasticSearch Training
InfluxDB/TICK Training TICK Consulting