Kinesis vs. Kafka - 2025 Comprehensive Comparison

January 9, 2025

                                                                           

🚀 What’s New in This 2025 Comparison

Platform Evolution Since 2017

  • Kafka 4.0 Released - No ZooKeeper, improved performance, cloud-native features
  • Kinesis Enhanced - 365-day retention, on-demand scaling, deeper AWS integration
  • Managed Services Matured - Amazon MSK and Confluent Cloud now production-ready
  • Cost Models Evolved - Better pricing for high-scale workloads
  • Security Enhanced - Zero-trust architectures, advanced compliance
  • Developer Experience - Improved tooling, SDKs, and monitoring

Key Differentiators in 2025

  • Performance - Kafka leads in throughput, Kinesis in simplicity
  • Cost - Kinesis for small/medium, Kafka for massive scale
  • Operations - Kinesis is serverless, Kafka offers more control
  • Ecosystem - Kinesis for AWS-native, Kafka for multi-cloud

Executive Summary

In 2025, both Amazon Kinesis and Apache Kafka have evolved into mature, enterprise-grade streaming platforms. This guide helps you choose the right platform based on your specific requirements, workload characteristics, and organizational capabilities.

Cloudurable provides Kafka training, Kafka consulting, Kinesis consulting, and helps organizations implement streaming architectures.

Core Platform Comparison

flowchart TB
  subgraph Kinesis["Amazon Kinesis"]
    K1[Kinesis Data Streams]
    K2[Kinesis Data Firehose]
    K3[Kinesis Data Analytics]
    K4[Kinesis Video Streams]
  end
  
  subgraph Kafka["Apache Kafka"]
    A1[Kafka Core/KRaft]
    A2[Kafka Streams]
    A3[Kafka Connect]
    A4[ksqlDB]
  end
  
  subgraph Use Cases
    UC1[Real-time Analytics]
    UC2[Event Streaming]
    UC3[Log Aggregation]
    UC4[IoT Data]
    UC5[ML Pipelines]
  end
  
  Kinesis --> UC1
  Kinesis --> UC4
  Kafka --> UC2
  Kafka --> UC3
  Both[Both Platforms] --> UC5
  
  style Kinesis fill:#ff9900,stroke:#232f3e,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
  style Kafka fill:#231f20,stroke:#f7931e,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff

Architectural Differences

Feature Kinesis Kafka
Scaling Unit Shards (1MB/s write, 2MB/s read) Partitions (30K+ msg/s)
Data Model Records in shards Records in topic partitions
Ordering Per shard Per partition
Replication Automatic 3 AZ sync Configurable (typically 3)
Consensus Managed by AWS KRaft (no ZooKeeper)

Performance Benchmarks 2025

Throughput Comparison

graph LR
  subgraph "Throughput (Messages/Second)"
    A[Small Workload<br/>100K msg/s] -->|Kinesis: Easy| K1[10-100 shards]
    A -->|Kafka: Overkill| K2[1-3 brokers]
    
    B[Medium Workload<br/>1M msg/s] -->|Kinesis: Expensive| K3[1000 shards]
    B -->|Kafka: Efficient| K4[6-10 brokers]
    
    C[Large Workload<br/>10M+ msg/s] -->|Kinesis: Complex| K5[10K+ shards]
    C -->|Kafka: Optimal| K6[20-50 brokers]
  end
  
  style A fill:#90EE90
  style B fill:#FFD700
  style C fill:#FF6347

Latency Characteristics

  • Kafka: Sub-millisecond possible with tuning
  • Kinesis: 70-200ms typical end-to-end latency

Scalability Limits

  • Kafka: Virtually unlimited with proper architecture
  • Kinesis: Soft limit of 10,000 shards per account (can be increased)

Cost Analysis 2025

Kinesis Pricing Model

Base Costs:
  Shard Hour: $0.015/hour
  PUT Payload Unit: $0.014 per million
  Extended Retention: $0.023/GB/month
  
Example (1M events/day, 1KB each):
  Monthly: ~$350-500

Kafka/MSK Pricing Model

MSK Costs:
  kafka.m5.large: $0.21/hour ($151/month)
  Storage: $0.10/GB/month
  Data Transfer: Variable
  
Example (1M events/day, 1KB each):
  Monthly: ~$450-600 (3 brokers)

Cost Decision Matrix

Daily Volume Best Choice Rationale
< 100K events Kinesis Lower operational overhead
100K - 10M Either Depends on team expertise
10M - 100M MSK/Kafka Better cost efficiency
> 100M Self-managed Kafka Maximum cost optimization

Feature Comparison 2025

Data Management

Feature Kinesis Kafka
Max Retention 365 days Unlimited
Log Compaction ❌ Not supported ✅ Supported
Replay ✅ By timestamp ✅ By offset/timestamp
Compression ✅ Automatic ✅ Configurable
Encryption ✅ Built-in ✅ Configurable

Integration Ecosystem

Kinesis Native Integrations

  • AWS Lambda - Direct triggers
  • S3 - Via Firehose
  • Redshift - Direct loading
  • ElasticSearch - Via Firehose
  • SageMaker - ML pipelines
  • CloudWatch - Metrics/logs

Kafka Ecosystem

  • Spark/Flink - Stream processing
  • Debezium - CDC
  • Elasticsearch - Via Connect
  • HDFS/S3 - Via Connect
  • Kubernetes - Native operators
  • Every database - 200+ connectors

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Kinesis When:

AWS-Centric Architecture

  • All infrastructure in AWS
  • Heavy use of Lambda, S3, Redshift
  • Need tight AWS service integration

Operational Simplicity

  • Limited DevOps resources
  • Want serverless, no cluster management
  • Prefer pay-per-use pricing

Moderate Scale

  • < 10 million events/day
  • Predictable traffic patterns
  • Standard retention needs

Quick Time-to-Market

  • Rapid prototyping
  • Proof of concepts
  • Startups/small teams

Choose Kafka When:

Extreme Performance

  • Need lowest latency
  • Massive throughput (billions/day)
  • Complex event processing

Multi-Cloud/Hybrid

  • Not locked to AWS
  • On-premise requirements
  • Multi-region deployments

Advanced Features

  • Log compaction needed
  • Unlimited retention
  • Custom partitioning

Deep Customization

  • Complex security requirements
  • Custom monitoring/tooling
  • Specific compliance needs

Managed Service Comparison

Amazon MSK vs Kinesis

graph TB
  subgraph "Operational Responsibility"
    subgraph "Kinesis"
      K1[AWS Manages Everything]
      K2[You: Configure shards]
      K3[You: Set retention]
    end
    
    subgraph "MSK"
      M1[AWS: Infrastructure]
      M2[You: Kafka config]
      M3[You: Topics/partitions]
      M4[You: Monitoring setup]
    end
  end
  
  K1 --> K2
  K2 --> K3
  
  M1 --> M2
  M2 --> M3
  M3 --> M4
  
  style K1 fill:#90EE90
  style M1 fill:#FFD700

Managed Kafka Options

  1. Amazon MSK - Best for AWS deployments
  2. Confluent Cloud - Best for multi-cloud
  3. Aiven - Good European option
  4. Redpanda Cloud - Kafka API compatible

Security & Compliance 2025

Kinesis Security

  • IAM Integration - Native AWS permissions
  • VPC Endpoints - Private connectivity
  • KMS Encryption - At rest and in transit
  • Compliance - HIPAA, PCI, SOC, FedRAMP
  • Audit - CloudTrail integration

Kafka Security

  • mTLS - Certificate-based auth
  • SASL/SCRAM - Username/password
  • ACLs - Fine-grained permissions
  • Encryption - TLS and KMS
  • Compliance - Depends on deployment

Real-World Use Cases

Companies Using Kinesis

  • Netflix - Recommendation events
  • Lyft - Real-time pricing
  • Zillow - Property view tracking
  • BBC - Live streaming analytics
  • Samsung - IoT device telemetry

Companies Using Kafka

  • LinkedIn - 7 trillion messages/day
  • Uber - Trip updates
  • Netflix - Event sourcing
  • Airbnb - Search indexing
  • Goldman Sachs - Trading systems

Developer Experience

Kinesis Development

// Simple Kinesis Producer
KinesisProducer producer = new KinesisProducer(config);
ListenableFuture<UserRecordResult> future = producer.addUserRecord(
    "my-stream",
    "partitionKey",
    ByteBuffer.wrap(data)
);

// Simple Kinesis Consumer
KinesisClientLibConfiguration config = new KinesisClientLibConfiguration(
    "my-app",
    "my-stream",
    credentialsProvider,
    workerId
);
Worker worker = new Worker.Builder()
    .recordProcessorFactory(new MyRecordProcessorFactory())
    .config(config)
    .build();
worker.run();

Kafka Development

// Simple Kafka Producer
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092");
props.put("key.serializer", StringSerializer.class);
props.put("value.serializer", StringSerializer.class);

Producer<String, String> producer = new KafkaProducer<>(props);
producer.send(new ProducerRecord<>("my-topic", "key", "value"));

// Simple Kafka Consumer
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092");
props.put("group.id", "my-group");
props.put("key.deserializer", StringDeserializer.class);
props.put("value.deserializer", StringDeserializer.class);

Consumer<String, String> consumer = new KafkaConsumer<>(props);
consumer.subscribe(Arrays.asList("my-topic"));

while (true) {
    ConsumerRecords<String, String> records = consumer.poll(100);
    for (ConsumerRecord<String, String> record : records) {
        System.out.println(record.value());
    }
}

Migration Strategies

Kinesis to Kafka Migration

flowchart LR
  A[Kinesis] --> B[Dual Write]
  B --> C[Kafka]
  B --> D[Validation]
  D --> E[Cut Over]
  E --> F[Kafka Only]
  
  style A fill:#ff9900
  style F fill:#231f20
  1. Dual Write - Send to both systems
  2. Validate - Compare data integrity
  3. Migrate Consumers - One at a time
  4. Cut Over - Stop Kinesis writes
  5. Decommission - Remove Kinesis

Kafka to Kinesis Migration

Less common, but follows similar pattern with MirrorMaker or custom consumers.

Decision Framework

graph TD
  A[Start] --> B{AWS Only?}
  B -->|Yes| C{Scale?}
  B -->|No| K[Choose Kafka]
  
  C -->|Small/Medium| D{DevOps Team?}
  C -->|Large| K
  
  D -->|Limited| E[Choose Kinesis]
  D -->|Strong| F{Cost Sensitive?}
  
  F -->|Very| K
  F -->|No| G{Need Simple?}
  
  G -->|Yes| E
  G -->|No| K
  
  style E fill:#ff9900,color:#fff
  style K fill:#231f20,color:#fff

Recommendations by Industry

Financial Services

  • High-Frequency Trading: Kafka (latency critical)
  • Fraud Detection: Either (Kinesis for AWS-native)
  • Regulatory Reporting: Kafka (audit requirements)

E-Commerce

  • Click Tracking: Kinesis (easy integration)
  • Inventory Updates: Kafka (exactly-once)
  • Recommendation Events: Either works well

IoT/Manufacturing

  • Device Telemetry: Kinesis (managed scaling)
  • Industrial IoT: Kafka (on-premise option)
  • Connected Vehicles: Kafka (volume/features)

Media/Entertainment

  • Video Analytics: Kinesis Video Streams
  • User Engagement: Either platform
  • Content Delivery: Kafka (global scale)

Future Outlook 2025-2026

Kinesis Roadmap

  • Enhanced machine learning integration
  • Lower latency options
  • More granular cost controls
  • Improved cross-region replication

Kafka Evolution

  • Simplified operations (more like Kinesis)
  • Better cloud-native features
  • Enhanced security defaults
  • Improved developer experience

Summary & Recommendations

For Most Organizations

  1. Start with Kinesis if:

    • You’re AWS-native
    • Want minimal operations
    • Have moderate scale
    • Need quick deployment
  2. Choose Kafka/MSK if:

    • Need maximum performance
    • Require advanced features
    • Have multi-cloud needs
    • Can invest in expertise
  3. Consider Hybrid:

    • Kinesis for simple pipelines
    • Kafka for complex processing
    • Bridge with Lambda/Connect

Action Items

  • Evaluate current and projected scale
  • Assess team capabilities
  • Calculate total cost of ownership
  • Run proof of concept
  • Plan migration strategy

Get Expert Help

Need assistance choosing or implementing the right streaming platform?

Cloudurable offers:

  • Architecture assessment
  • Platform selection guidance
  • Implementation services
  • Migration assistance
  • Training and mentoring
  • 24/7 support

Contact us to discuss your streaming data needs.


Last updated: January 2025 - Reflecting latest features and pricing

                                                                           
comments powered by Disqus

Apache Spark Training
Kafka Tutorial
Akka Consulting
Cassandra Training
AWS Cassandra Database Support
Kafka Support Pricing
Cassandra Database Support Pricing
Non-stop Cassandra
Watchdog
Advantages of using Cloudurable™
Cassandra Consulting
Cloudurable™| Guide to AWS Cassandra Deploy
Cloudurable™| AWS Cassandra Guidelines and Notes
Free guide to deploying Cassandra on AWS
Kafka Training
Kafka Consulting
DynamoDB Training
DynamoDB Consulting
Kinesis Training
Kinesis Consulting
Kafka Tutorial PDF
Kubernetes Security Training
Redis Consulting
Redis Training
ElasticSearch / ELK Consulting
ElasticSearch Training
InfluxDB/TICK Training TICK Consulting